A major artificial-intelligence conference has rejected 497 papers — roughly 2% of submissions — whose authors violated ...

Artificial intelligence has quietly reshaped the foundation of scientific publishing, yet about three-quarters of researchers say they’re unsure or unaware whether publishers used AI during their ...

The arrival of AI-generated research papers marks a turning point that could radically accelerate discovery—or drown it in ...

AI Scientist, an autonomous research tool, first released in 2024, has now undergone peer review, highlighting its strengths ...

A top AI conference just turned the tables on artificial intelligence, by using it to catch reviewers secretly relying on AI. Per Nature, the International Conference on Machine Learning, set for July ...

The certification architecture of modern science has always rested on a social compact: that qualified humans, selected by ...

A new whitepaper from Frontiers shows that AI has rapidly become part of everyday peer review, with 53% of reviewers now using AI tools. The findings in Unlocking AI’s untapped potential: responsible ...

As technology and artificial intelligence continue to reshape the publishing landscape, human peer reviewers remain essential to research integrity that contribute to their fields by ensuring quality, ...

A paper built entirely by artificial intelligence did not arrive with a flashy headline. At its core, the study delivers a surprisingly flat result: a promising technique that does nothing to improve ...

George Chalhoub argues for transparent and enforceable guidelines for regulating the use of AI in scientific peer review. "AI is a tool, not a decision-maker. Protecting the credibility of the ...

A new global reviewer survey from IOP Publishing (IOPP) reveals a growing divide in attitudes among reviewers in the physical sciences regarding the use of generative AI in peer review. The study ...